Costas Andriopoulos, Urban area, University London, United KingdomJosh Keller, UNSW Questionnaire, AustraliaMarianne W

SWG 09: Business Paradox: Entertaining Plurality, Tensions and you can Contradictions

• Quinn, Robert Age., and you will Kim S. Cameron, eds. Contradiction and you may Transformation: Towards a concept off Change in Providers and Government. Cambridge MA: Ballinger, 1988. This edited regularity is sold with essays from luminaries from inside the organizational principle providing expertise exactly how paradox is also revision and is told because of the proper thinking, business changes, communication, and you can category personality. This type of today vintage essays bring foundational skills having applying paradox theory so you can organizational phenomena.
• Smith, Kenwyn K., and you may David Letter. Berg. Paradoxes away from Classification Lives: Skills Argument, Paralysis, and you will Way in group Figure. Bay area: Jossey-Trout, 1987. Smith and you can Berg determine paradox as “an announcement otherwise gang of statements which can be thinking-referential and you will inconsistent and you can produce a vicious loop” (p. 12). They trace the brand new sources off paradoxical believe attracting greatly with the psychoanalysis, and additionally they emphasize 12 paradoxes inside teams and you may merge him or her within the three various other classes: paradoxes off belonging, paradoxes away from interesting, and you will paradoxes out-of speaking. That it text message now offers a young method to examining contradiction inside organizational phenomena.

Coordinators

Lewis, University regarding Cincinnati, USAElla Miron-Spektor, INSEAD, European countries Campus, FranceCamille Pradies, EDHEC Organization College, FranceJonathan Schad, King’s University London area, United KingdomWendy K. Smith, College or university regarding Delaware, United states of america

Organizational lives faces unprecedented complexity. Multiple and you will contradictory desires, competing stakeholder needs, and you may punctual-moving change even more produce chronic and interwoven tensions, such now and you can tomorrow, social missions and you can business demands, centralization and decentralization, balance and alter. Whereas conventional government look stresses backup answers to generate specific possibilities anywhere between solutions of a tension, a contradiction means underlines the value of embracing competing requires while doing so (Lewis, 2000). A contradiction depicts good tension’s facets once the contradictory and you will inconsistent, yet , and interdependent, fun, and collectively constituted (Farjoun, 2010; Smith Lewis, 2011). Entertaining fighting means in addition permits longterm business sustainability.

The purpose of SWG 09 will be to get better the comprehension of plurality, tensions, and you will contradictions to better engage him or her having managerial habit (discover Putnam mais aussi al., 2016; Schad mais aussi al., 2016).

Throughout the proceeded sub-layouts on EGOS Colloquia, our company is in a position to subsequent all of our comprehension of stress and you may contradictions, and and therefore establish obvious limitations and you will meanings. Building towards a thriving people from students, we currently attempt to pertain the new theoretical landscapes and you may mention methodological opportunities to find the complete potential off contradiction research.

SWG 09: Organizational Paradox: Enjoyable Plurality, Stress and Contradictions

• Knowing the sourced elements of stress: Stress is actually depicted given that inherent to throwing also socially created (Smith Lewis, 2011). Current search shows you one stress will likely be rooted in cutting-edge options, for this reason , they can be latent and get outstanding (Schad Bansal, 2018).
• Numerous, interwoven stress: Because of the pervasiveness out-of multiple stress, students will get study co-thickness away from stress (Jarzabkowski ainsi que al., 2013), hence period amounts of a support groups (Andriopoulos Lewis, 2009), and will become interrelationships certainly one of stress (Sheep mais aussi al., 2017).
• Microfoundations: Which are the microfoundations out of paradoxes (Miron-Spektor mais aussi al., 2018)? What is the role regarding ideas – anxiety, ambivalence, susceptability – in sustaining otherwise leveraging paradoxical tensions (Vince Broussine, 1996)? Which are the effects to have administration and company (Hahn ainsi que al., 2014)?
• Paradoxes regarding grand and you can state-of-the-art demands:Considering the modifying surroundings off teams plus the ecosystem he’s stuck inside (public opinions, political orientations, technical, etcetera.) how does paradox due to the fact good contact lens improve when controling huge and you can cutting-edge pressures?
• This new tips when you look at the contradiction research: What exactly are the strategies otherwise combos out-of actions that can help you have a look at paradoxes empirically (Andriopoulos Gotsi, 2017; Jarzabkowski ainsi que al., 2019)? Were there the newest ways triangulation informed by contradiction principle, merging qualitative, quantitative and experimental ways? Can paradox theory take advantage of the studies away from huge analysis or simulations? Just how can contradiction be used to explore stress anywhere between idea and you can actions?