03/08/2022
81 Stuart J. Johnston, Microsoft Settles to have Little bit of Stac, Computerworld, June 27, 1994, at 30 (Microsoft paid $39.9 million for 155’o of Stac, and an additional $43 million over 43 months for a license to Stac’s data compression technology); Doug Barney, Microsoft, Stac Handle Argument; Microsoft Fundamentally Pays Upwards, InfoWorld, June 27, 1994, at 14.
83 As explained in Section V.C., infra, the superficially irrational behavior of undermining the application vendors that produce programs that run on Microsoft’s operating system is logical specifically while the Microsoft has an independent economic incentive to monopolize the s.
85 Amy Cortese, Business Week, Dec. 19, 1994, supra, at 35 (HP, Compaq and other big U.S. PC makers plan to bundle Windows 95 into their machines).
86 Select Lawrence J. Microsoft: Not so Wonderful, Bay Area Computer Currents, Dec. 1, 1994, at 98, 101 (Ex. 1); Carole Patton, Computerworld, Nov. 14, 1994, supra, at 57 (Ex. 8).
88 Don Clark, Microsoft to invest in Intuit In the Stock Treaty, Wall St. J., Oct. 14, 1994, at A3 (86% of retail store sales); Karen Epper, App Offer Shakes Upwards Family Financial, Amer. Banker, Oct. 17, 1994, at 1, 25 (80-85%).
89 Michelle Flores, Wants Info, Seattle Times, Nov. 22, 1994, at B11; Michael Schrage, Microsoft Produces Lots of money; Will it Shape the treating of They?, Washington Post, Oct. 21, 1994, at B3; Brent Schlender, Fortune, Jan. 16, 1995, supra, at 36.
91 Brent Schendler, Fortune, Jan. 16, 1995, supra, at 4748; find together with, Michael I. Miller, PC Magazine, Jan. 24, 1995, supra, at 80 (Ex. 25) (“Microsoft could require just a small service charge on each transaction. Or it could make money on the float — the interest in the few seconds it takes to move money from one place to another. Or both.”).
92 For example, leading industry analyst Rick Sherlund of Goldman Sachs predicted that with the settlement, Microsoft “should dominate the market for desktop software for the next 10 years.” And another leading analyst, Richard Shaffer concluded that “It]he operating system wars are over — Microsoft is the winner . Microsoft is the Standard Oil of its day.” Andrew Schulman, Microsoft’s Grip Towards Application Fasten From the Antitrust Bargain, Dr. Dobb’s Journal of Software Tools, Oct. 1994, at 143 (Ex. 13).
93 See John M. Goodman, New Dos Heavyweights Wade Other Round, InfoWorld, Aug. 29, 1994, at 87 (rating PC-DOS version 6.3 above MS-DOS version 6.22) and Earle Robinson, DOS-adaptation Insanity? Integration Coping with Dos, Windows Sources, Oct. 1994, at 163 (“my choice would be the IBM . . . it’s cheaper”) and Yael Li-Ron, Desktop Dos 6.3: 2 and Dos: Broke up At the Delivery, PC-Computing, bra computers ship with MS-DOS).
Probe from Microsoft is Prolonged – Justice Dept
94 Don Clark Laurie Hays, Microsoft’s Brand new Sale Ideas Mark Issues, Wall St. J., Dec. 12, 1994, at B6 (Ex. 41).
96 All of these problems are discussed in Rory O’Connor, San Jose Mercury News, Nov. 13, 1994, supra, at 1A, 28A (Ex. 34).
Magid
99 Indeed, Microsoft’s operating system “lock-in” has permitted it to bring demonstrably inferior products to market (products that did not enjoy any https://datingranking.net/three-day-rule-review/ appreciable consumer acceptance) without negative consequences to the company. See Michael Morris, Microsoft Bargain: Insufficient, Too late, S.F. Examiner, July 24, 1994, at C-5. (Ex. 33)
100 Joseph Farrell, Huntsman K. Monroe and you can Garth Saloner, The fresh new Vertical Company Regarding World and you will Options Battle In the place of Component Battle, Oct 1994 (operating paper).
101 See, elizabeth.g., supra, note 32. (Microsoft presently holds greater than 90% of the X86 operating system market share); Christopher O’Malley, Personal Computing, October 1986, supra, at 181, 183 (“Microsoft’s operating system” has “better than 95 percent” share of the X86 systems.)